Elizabeth Searing is an assistant professorAssistant Professor at the State University of New YorkTexas at Albany. SheDallas . In this video excerpt, Searing explains the challenges of nonprofit finance and explains the benefitsbenefit theory of nonprofit finance. Recorded with an Instant-Messaging-Service and the relation between the type of the good or service you’re offering and the ideal type of funding it.

For Searing, there is no ideal mix of financial sources because the financial portfolio is always going to be dependent on the types of services one provides and the ecosystem one is situated in. But it is advisable not to concentrate on one particular source. Earned revenues are important if, for instance, government funding is missing. These revenues are some sound problems at the beginning. We apologizealso less restrictive: When selling T-shirts, an organization is free to use that money for any inconvenience this may purpose. For Searing, it is always good advice to have this option in the income portfolio compared to money with specific usage restrictions. Thus, it is always a kind of ‘individual diet’ which is going to vary depending on each organization.cause.

When it comes to financing in nonprofit and for-profit organizations, there are four major differences, according to Searing:

1. First of all, for nonprofit organizations, there is a huge variety of different types of financial sources, eg government grants, foundation money, individual donations, or even earned revenues – for example, when an organization sells products. In comparison, the financing in for-profit organizations is more straightforward, dependent on the market and private investment.

2. Secondly, handling markets and private investors is a lot easier for for-profits. An example Searing provides is: someone buys a cheeseburger for $3 US in McDonalds. In a nonprofit finance, this person is likely to add: ‘You can only use this money to buy meat, but not for the salaries of the managers and any other administrative expenses.’ This kind of donor stipulation is very common in nonprofits, but not in for-profits.

3. When it comes to nonprofit organizations, in many countries – especially Germany, Italy, England, and the US – there is a certain ‘asset lock’. It is not possible to tempt investors by offering them ownerships of parts of the company because they are publicly owned. The fact that there are no technical owners makes it more difficult to raise capital for nonprofit compared to for-profit organization.

4. Last but not least, the incentives when trying to convince someone to invest in a nonprofit or a for-profit organization are different. For nonprofits it is more difficult, since they have to pull on both the business and the charity side. And the task of explaining that money is needed to start off is not the easiest for a nonprofit, whereas for the for-profit it is only the business side, meaning profit maximization, they can concentrate on.

Lizenz

Downloads