THE EVOLUTION OF COGNITION
3.13
Reflection: What Makes Human Cognition Distinct?
Throughout this chapter, we traced a possible sequence of cognitive milestones: from reflexes and motivational states, through perceptual selection and learning, to cognitive maps, mental simulation, self-representation, empathy, Theory of Mind, and symbolic language. This sequence helps organize what we have learned, but it may also encourage us to treat cognition as a single ladder culminating in the human mind.
A more critical perspective questions this hierachical perspective. Cognitive capacities may instead represent partially independent solutions to different ecological needs. A species may excel in capacities such as spatial navigation, sensory discrimination, tool use, social learning, or causal inference without displaying the particular combination of abilities characteristic of human cognition.
Language raises a particularly difficult question. It is often treated as the defining human cognitive ability, but language is unlikely to be a single cognitive capacity. It depends on symbolic representation, categorization, memory, sequencing, the productive combination of concepts and the ability to reflect on and shift between different frames of reference. Language may therefore be better understood as a system that reorganizes and extends more basic cognitive capacities. Ape-language research also suggests that several components of symbolic cognition are not exclusively human, even if their spontaneous integration and open-ended use may be.
Task
Write a short reflective paragraph of approximately 300 words in response to the following question: What, at a foundational level, distinguishes human cognition from that of other animals?
Consider this question through the example of language.In your response, examine whether human distinctiveness lies in language itself or in the integration of more basic cognitive and motivational capacities that make language possible. Which candidate abilities might be foundational, such as symbolic representation, reflection on and coordination of different frames of reference, mental simulation, social learning, or cumulative cultural transmission?
Also consider whether comparable capacities in other species may remain underestimated because experimental tasks are designed around human sensory systems, motivations, and modes of response. Distinguish carefully between evidence that a species lacks a capacity and evidence that it has not demonstrated that capacity under the conditions tested.
If you find this task really really difficult, don’t worry! This remains an unresolved problem in cognitive science. The aim is not to provide a definitive answer, but to identify which distinctions, assumptions, and forms of evidence help sharpen the question.
We would suggest that you keep your paragraph, especially, if you are participating in a course at the University, you may discuss it then with your peers and the tutors in a next meeting.
Authors: Fabian Mueller & William Palmer